|
Article 43 of the AA-TWU Agreement
Dear Brothers & Sisters,
In recent months, many members have expressed concerns about the company’s ability to extend part-time employees beyond their regular shifts. The following is a list of frequently asked question and answers:
Can the company involuntarily force a part-time employee beyond their regular shifts? Yes. The company may force par-time employees to work beyond their regular shifts up to eight hours.
Does an emergency need to be declared in order for the company to force the part-time employee? No. The company may extend the part-time employees due to operational necessities provided they have exhausted all full-time employees who are available for overtime as provided for in Article 43 L (page 173) of the AA_TWU agreement.
What is the process for part-time extensions? First, the company is required to identify the operational need for the extensions and the amount of required personnel needed (ex. 20 employees) for a specific period of time (1400- 1600) to accomplish the work.
Second the company is contractually required to first proffer all full-time employees that made themselves available for holdover overtime (ex. 3 employees) and early call-in overtime (ex. 4 employees). In this example, there are 7 full-time employees available and would be proffered the overtime before any extensions are forced. There is a deficit of 13 employees needed to accomplish the work.
Third, the company can solicit any fulltime employee not on the overtime list and then offer voluntarily and part-time employee that would like to be extended to fill the deficit of 13 employees.
Finally, in the event the company is not able to satisfy the deficit then they may involuntarily extend the lowest senior 13 part-time employees in the work unit whose shift ends at 1400 hours to accomplish the work.
Can the company extend part-time employees prior to calling full-time employees on day-off overtime? Yes. Day off overtime is not a prerequisite of part-time extensions. The only requirement is holdover and early call-in overtime prior to any part-time extensions. However, when day-off overtime is needed, it must first be proffered to full-time employees prior to part-time day-off solicitation.
History of Article 43
In the early 80’s the company and the union negotiated an agreement that provided for the use of part-time employees in an effort make the company more profitability. The union had concerns about the misuse of part-time employees that may replace the full-time work force with part-timers. As a result of these concerns, the company and the union agreed to part-time employees and included contractual language that would restrict the use of part-time employee. In conclusion, the final product of the negotiations provided profitability for the company while insuring restrictions of the use of part-time employees and preserving full-time employees’ status.
Fraternally,
Michael Garcia
2nd Vice President
TWU local 568
MIA-TPA-FLL
|